Quote from: Hauke on May 21, 2024, 02:29:16 PM...and some more evidence: I created a mixed mapsource, combining offline (local mbtiles) plus online (Web-URLs with pbf tile services). When I put Oruxmaps into the background, the offline-tiles "die", i.e. they miss in the rendering. The online sources continue to work. So the renderer obviously works, but data delivery through the local web server is not successful.Hello, maybe the problem is not Oruxmaps or yours, I explained some time ago I was looking for information on how to create my offline mapbox, in the documentation I found
Since I had no reaction to this bug yet: What is the best way forward? How can I best provide input? How do I know if this bug caught the awareness of the developers? Don't get me wrong: I do not want to put pressure or so, I just would love to hear feedback. It takes as long as it takes of course!
https://docs.mapbox.com/help/troubleshooting/mobile-offline/
The mapbox SDK offers the direct download of tiles from your online maps, to work in cache.
This is offered directly by Oruxmaps Gp
What I'm saying is that I think the mapbox sdk isn't developed to use the "homemade" maps you're developing.
At least the most modern versions of the mapbox sdk.
The Spain maps app uses an older sdk than Oruxmaps Gp, this version of the sdk does not have a 3D viewer but the offline maps of the IGN work better (not perfectly) with this sdk, than with the Oruxmaps Gp sdk
The potential of the mapbox sdk is in the online maps today, and in making it easier to download to use As a cac memory
Strava, fatmap, uses the same sdk as Oruxmaps Gp offering the
But in Oruxmaps we are offered the possibility to use our maps.
I add: try using lighter weight maps.
About the developers of Oruxmaps........ It's only one, surprising isn't it?