Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Bert

#1
I don't understand. Every pixel ? When I define every corner of the map with coordinates and the size of the map in pixels, it is just a recalculation of X and Y to coordinates. On a Mercator projection that should be linear. I first tried to give the X and Y values as distance in kilometers, but that gave completely wrong figures, also in the script. When I replaced the distances in pixels (of the jpg), that problem disappeared, and the script was right. But when I use this map and script, the coordinates in Oruxmaps dont make sense. This could be because the map has not been coded correctly, or, whe placed in Oruxmaps, it cannot find it's references. Wha, by the way, is the meaning of "adding an empty map" ? Is this to get the map placed in a bigger "map" ?  A more detailed manual of Oruxmaps desktop would be welcome.
#2
I posted this on 18 March.41 have read it, none has replied. I am now preparing my boat to go to Denmark. It is disappointing not to get any help. I'll keep using the paper charts, although I believe that it is a minor problem, for which I have no soltution.  Bye Oruxmaps.
#3
I scanned a DKW map of the coast of Holland as jpg. Via Oruxmaps desktop I got the following XML file.

When loaded into Oruxmaps, the Coordinates are completely wrong: places closer to Greenwich have a higher coordinate than places further east, places with same latitude have nevertheless different coordinates. What is wrong with this file ?

Please help. I'm a sailor, not a geologist.



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<OruxTracker xmlns:orux="http://oruxtracker.com/app/res/calibration">http://oruxtracker.com/app/res/calibration"

 versionCode="3.0">

<MapCalibration layers="true" layerLevel="0">

<MapName><![CDATA[pixels2]]></MapName>

<OruxTracker versionCode="2.1">

<MapCalibration layers="false" layerLevel="13">

<MapName><![CDATA[pixels2 13]]></MapName>

<MapChunks xMax="12" yMax="8" datum="WGS 1984:Global Definition@WGS 1984:Global Definition" projection="Mercator,3" img_height="512" img_width="512" file_name="pixels2 13" />

<MapDimensions height="3876" width="5916" />

<MapBounds minLat="51.576" maxLat="52.155" minLon="3.454" maxLon="4.296" />

<CalibrationPoints>

<CalibrationPoint corner="TL" lon="3.454" lat="52.155" />

<CalibrationPoint corner="BR" lon="4.296" lat="51.576" />

<CalibrationPoint corner="TR" lon="4.296" lat="52.155" />

<CalibrationPoint corner="BL" lon="3.454" lat="51.576" />

</CalibrationPoints>

</MapCalibration>

</OruxTracker>

</MapCalibration>

</OruxTracker>
#4
MEJORAS/NEW FEATURES / Re: ENC maps
February 13, 2015, 06:38:35 PM
I have exactly the same question>. I am most surprised that this question isover a year on this board, 500 people looked at it, and nobody replied .