Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - sergio2

#1
GENERAL / Re: Total ascents undervalued
June 16, 2017, 07:40:35 PM
Quote from: "orux"
Quote from: "sergio2"
Quote from: "orux"


Hi,



It is a value very difficult to calculate;



If you send me a gpx with a file, I can see where is the problem,



orux


Thank you for your answer.

Here's two .gpx files recorded with OruxMaps.



http://www99.zippyshare.com/v/sHidHFCn/file.html">http://www99.zippyshare.com/v/sHidHFCn/file.html



In the first track, given total ascent is 645 m (real is close to 900 m).

In the second, given total ascent is 193 m (real is close to 400 m).


Hello;



why do you see that real value (1st track) is near 900m? Have you uploaded that track to another app/website to test those values?





orux


Hello,



The 900 m total ascent comes from an outdoor Garmin GPS (and from the corresponding software BaseCamp) and is very close to total ascent estimated from a paper map.
#2
GENERAL / Re: Total ascents undervalued
May 31, 2017, 09:07:58 AM
Quote from: "orux"
Quote from: "sergio2"Hi,



I recorded 2 hiking tracks on offline maps with OruxMaps.

In both cases total ascents are more than 1 half undervalued ! (200 m instead of 400 m for example).

What's up ?


Hi,



It is a value very difficult to calculate;



If you send me a gpx with a file, I can see where is the problem,



orux


Thank you for your answer.

Here's two .gpx files recorded with OruxMaps.



http://www99.zippyshare.com/v/sHidHFCn/file.html">http://www99.zippyshare.com/v/sHidHFCn/file.html



In the first track, given total ascent is 645 m (real is close to 900 m).

In the second, given total ascent is 193 m (real is close to 400 m).
#3
GENERAL / Total ascents undervalued
May 27, 2017, 07:00:55 PM
Hi,



I recorded 2 hiking tracks on offline maps with OruxMaps.

In both cases total ascents are more than 1 half undervalued ! (200 m instead of 400 m for example).

What's up ?
#4
GENERAL / Re: Android 7.0 and OruxMaps 7.0.10
May 01, 2017, 09:51:45 PM
Thanks for your answer.



In fact the right path in Oruxmaps global settings was :



/storage/2065-B825/Android/data/com.com.oruxmaps/





Strange path, 2065-B825 should be microSD ID number ?
#5
GENERAL / Android 7.0 and OruxMaps 7.0.10
April 28, 2017, 07:48:06 AM
Hi,



Impossible to put an Orux offline map on microSD on my android phone, it only works when put on phone internal storage.

Any idea ?

Device on android 7.0 and OruxMaps 7.0.10.



If I put maps into internal storage



/my files/internal storage/oruxmaps/mapfiles



off line maps are displayed : curiously, map folder in Oruxmaps settings is



/storage/emulated/0/oruxmaps/mapfiles



But if I put maps into microSD



/my files/SD card/Android/data/com.orux.oruxmaps/files



off line maps are not displayed anymore even when changing the path in Oruxmaps settings



/sdcard/Android/data/com.com.oruxmaps/files





What I did wrong ?