New beta version 9.x.x

[YvanCB]

Hello,
Amazing, I couldn't imagine that my little question will make so much agitation!
Thank you guys (LaurentG; Juanjo).
If I understand, we have to wait for a new Mobac's release?
Regards.

[LaurentG]

If I understand, we have to wait for a new Mobac's release?

Yes, it would be the best.
If you are in hurry, you can also generate your own version. It's clearly explained here : https://sourceforge.net/p/mobac/forum/general/thread/3a86f69952/
Personnally, I did it (it's easy), and resulting version works as expected.

[YvanCB]

Hello,
I will test this new file (MBTiles.java) with Mobac.
Thank you very much!
Regards.

[LaurentG]

Don't hesitate also to support my request on MOBAC's forum....

[YvanCB]

Don't hesitate also to support my request on MOBAC's forum....

It's done.
I hope they will understand me...
Regards.

[YvanCB]

Hello LaurentG (and all the others  ),

It seems your are a  good user of Mobac. Can you have a look to my post on Mobac Forum?
https://sourceforge.net/p/mobac/forum/general/thread/95bbf41816/
I'm talking about an "issue" with tiles selection...

Regards

[LaurentG]

Hi @YvanCB and @Juanjo,

did you see that a new version of MOBAC (2.31) has been published today ?
Among some other modifs, there is the update of MBTiles atlases to have the "limits" of the map set to the higest zoom, ie. to what is covered by ALL zooms present in the map.

[YvanCB]

Hello,

It's a very good news for us (and for me)  !
I will try this.

Regards.

[Juanjo]

Hi @YvanCB and @Juanjo,

did you see that a new version of MOBAC (2.31) has been published today ?
Among some other modifs, there is the update of MBTiles atlases to have the "limits" of the map set to the higest zoom, ie. to what is covered by ALL zooms present in the map.

Thank you LaurentG, I will give it a try

[Scotty]

Hi Ourx,
with 9.7 Beta 8 (and all Versions like 9.6.3 GP/ 7.4.26 before)I got always a hint top modify energy options, whenever I start to record a track. But I configured "Not to optimize". This issued occurs after I updated to Oneplus Oxygen OS 12.1/Android 12 on my Oneplus Nord.
With Android 11/Oxygen OS11.x this issue did not occure.

[YvanCB]

Hello Scotty,

I have a Huawei p40 pro+.
I have this kind of problem.
I read lot of things, talk on several forums, test everything: this problem is still there.
I have installed OM on lot of smartphone, the problem is only on my Huawei.

I hope that Orux can do something to fix this issue but I think that is not a problem due to Oruxmaps.

Regards.

PS: I have installed "GPS Status" it seems to work better... I'm not really sure, I have to make more tries.

[jose.h]

Beta10 changes look very interesting, and Sicami looks good!!!
Thank you!!

[YvanCB]

When I import the exported file to my favourite internet site (https://www.visugpx.com) I obtain the name below:
_![CDATA[2022-12-17 10_43_11]]
It's not like before. Before was better.😉

Regards.

Oruxmaps 9.7beta10 version:

Hello,
Now the exported GPX filename is ok.
Therefore the problem is still there when I import this file in a website.
Can you tell me what you think about this?
Regards.

[sica_2022]

Oruxmaps 9.7beta10 version:

Hello ,
Now the exported GPX filename is ok.
Therefore the problem is still there when I import this file in a website.
Can you tell me what you think about this?
Regards.

Hi YvanCB, are you referring to the website https://sicami.com? Or are you talking about another website?

[YvanCB]

Hello,

I'm referring to https://www.visugpx.com/ :

I just tried with https://sicami.com. The problem is not present

I am attaching 2 files:

• "Test.gpx" is a file downloaded from a website. No problem when I import it in Visugpx.
• "Exported Test.gpx" is the previous file imported in Oruxmpas, then exported to a GPX file (name Exported File.gpx), then imported in Visugpx. The problem is there.

I have edited the 2 files with an XML editor ==> the issue seems to come from the tag called "Name".
Have a look to the Tag given by Oruxmaps :

<name><![CDATA[Exported Test]]></name>

I think something goes wrong with Oruxmaps. Not important for lot of uses but in my case it's a little bit annoying.

Regards.